Compsognathus vs Dilophosaurus
A detailed side-by-side comparison of Compsognathus and Dilophosaurus, covering size, diet, classification, geologic period, and discovery history.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Eigenschaft | Compsognathus | Dilophosaurus |
|---|---|---|
| Wissenschaftlicher Name | Compsognathus longipes | Dilophosaurus wetherilli |
| Klassifikation | Theropoda | Theropoda |
| Zeitraum | Jurassic Late | Jurassic Early |
| Ernährung | Carnivore | Carnivore |
| Länge | 1.0 m | 7.0 m |
| Height | 0.3 m | 2.0 m |
| Gewicht | 3 kg | 400 kg |
| Entdeckungsjahr | 1859 | 1954 |
| Fundort | Riedenburg, Bavaria, Germany | Tuba City, Arizona, USA |
| Benannt von | Johann A. Wagner | Samuel P. Welles |
Size Comparison
smaller than a human child
roughly the length of a large SUV
Weight Comparison
lighter than a human adult
about 6 adult humans
Timeline Comparison
Diet Comparison
Compsognathus
CarnivoreCompsognathus was a meat-eating predator, hunting other animals for food.
Dilophosaurus
CarnivoreDilophosaurus was a meat-eating predator, hunting other animals for food.
Classification Comparison
Compsognathus
Dilophosaurus
Both dinosaurs share a common ancestor within the Theropoda clade.
Did You Know?
Dilophosaurus was about 7.0x longer than Compsognathus.
Dilophosaurus weighed roughly 133x more than Compsognathus.
Both Compsognathus and Dilophosaurus were carnivores.
Compsognathus lived during the Jurassic Late while Dilophosaurus lived during the Jurassic Early, separated by roughly 56 million years.
Compsognathus was discovered 95 years earlier, in 1859.
Both belong to the Theropoda clade, making them relatively close relatives.
Compare With Other Dinosaurs
Explore These Dinosaurs
Explore the Natural World
Discover more across the Nature FYI family