Allosaurus vs Eoraptor
A detailed side-by-side comparison of Allosaurus and Eoraptor, covering size, diet, classification, geologic period, and discovery history.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Eigenschaft | Allosaurus | Eoraptor |
|---|---|---|
| Wissenschaftlicher Name | Allosaurus fragilis | Eoraptor lunensis |
| Klassifikation | Theropoda | Saurischia |
| Zeitraum | Jurassic Late | Triassic Late |
| Ernährung | Carnivore | Omnivore |
| Länge | 9.7 m | 1.0 m |
| Height | 3.5 m | 0.3 m |
| Gewicht | 2.3 t | 10 kg |
| Entdeckungsjahr | 1877 | 1993 |
| Fundort | Garden Park, Colorado, USA | Ischigualasto Formation, Argentina |
| Benannt von | Othniel Charles Marsh | Paul Sereno et al. |
Size Comparison
roughly the length of a large SUV
smaller than a human child
Weight Comparison
comparable to 2.3 small cars
lighter than a human adult
Timeline Comparison
Diet Comparison
Allosaurus
CarnivoreAllosaurus was a meat-eating predator, hunting other animals for food.
Eoraptor
OmnivoreEoraptor had an omnivorous diet, consuming both plants and small animals.
Classification Comparison
Allosaurus
Eoraptor
Group: Saurischia
(Lizard-hipped dinosaurs)
Did You Know?
Allosaurus was about 9.7x longer than Eoraptor.
Allosaurus weighed roughly 230x more than Eoraptor.
Allosaurus was a carnivore while Eoraptor was a omnivore.
Allosaurus lived during the Jurassic Late while Eoraptor lived during the Triassic Late, separated by roughly 92 million years.
Allosaurus was discovered 116 years earlier, in 1877.
Allosaurus belonged to Theropoda while Eoraptor belonged to Saurischia.
Compare With Other Dinosaurs
Explore These Dinosaurs
Explore the Natural World
Discover more across the Nature FYI family