Anchiornis vs Coelophysis
A detailed side-by-side comparison of Anchiornis and Coelophysis, covering size, diet, classification, geologic period, and discovery history.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Property | Anchiornis | Coelophysis |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific Name | Anchiornis huxleyi | Coelophysis bauri |
| Classification | Theropoda | Theropoda |
| Period | Jurassic Late | Triassic Late |
| Diet | Insectivore | Carnivore |
| Length | 0.4 m | 3.0 m |
| Height | 0.2 m | 1.0 m |
| Weight | 0 kg | 20 kg |
| Discovery Year | 2009 | 1889 |
| Discovery Location | Tiaojishan Formation, China | Ghost Ranch, New Mexico, USA |
| Named By | Xu Xing et al. | Edward Drinker Cope |
Size Comparison
smaller than a human child
about the size of a human adult
Weight Comparison
lighter than a human adult
lighter than a human adult
Timeline Comparison
Diet Comparison
Anchiornis
InsectivoreAnchiornis primarily fed on insects and other small invertebrates.
Coelophysis
CarnivoreCoelophysis was a meat-eating predator, hunting other animals for food.
Classification Comparison
Anchiornis
Coelophysis
Both dinosaurs share a common ancestor within the Theropoda clade.
Did You Know?
Coelophysis was about 7.5x longer than Anchiornis.
Coelophysis weighed roughly 200x more than Anchiornis.
Anchiornis was a insectivore while Coelophysis was a carnivore.
Anchiornis lived during the Jurassic Late while Coelophysis lived during the Triassic Late, separated by roughly 92 million years.
Coelophysis was discovered 120 years earlier, in 1889.
Both belong to the Theropoda clade, making them relatively close relatives.
Compare With Other Dinosaurs
Explore These Dinosaurs
Explore the Natural World
Discover more across the Nature FYI family