Coelophysis vs Eoraptor
A detailed side-by-side comparison of Coelophysis and Eoraptor, covering size, diet, classification, geologic period, and discovery history.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Property | Coelophysis | Eoraptor |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific Name | Coelophysis bauri | Eoraptor lunensis |
| Classification | Theropoda | Saurischia |
| Period | Triassic Late | Triassic Late |
| Diet | Carnivore | Omnivore |
| Length | 3.0 m | 1.0 m |
| Height | 1.0 m | 0.3 m |
| Weight | 20 kg | 10 kg |
| Discovery Year | 1889 | 1993 |
| Discovery Location | Ghost Ranch, New Mexico, USA | Ischigualasto Formation, Argentina |
| Named By | Edward Drinker Cope | Paul Sereno et al. |
Size Comparison
about the size of a human adult
smaller than a human child
Weight Comparison
lighter than a human adult
lighter than a human adult
Timeline Comparison
Coelophysis and Eoraptor both lived during the Triassic Late period and may have shared the same habitats.
Diet Comparison
Coelophysis
CarnivoreCoelophysis was a meat-eating predator, hunting other animals for food.
Eoraptor
OmnivoreEoraptor had an omnivorous diet, consuming both plants and small animals.
Classification Comparison
Coelophysis
Eoraptor
Group: Saurischia
(Lizard-hipped dinosaurs)
Did You Know?
Coelophysis was about 3.0x longer than Eoraptor.
Coelophysis was a carnivore while Eoraptor was a omnivore.
Both dinosaurs lived during the Triassic Late period and may have coexisted.
Coelophysis was discovered 104 years earlier, in 1889.
Coelophysis belonged to Theropoda while Eoraptor belonged to Saurischia.
Compare With Other Dinosaurs
Explore These Dinosaurs
Explore the Natural World
Discover more across the Nature FYI family