Baryonyx vs Triceratops
A detailed side-by-side comparison of Baryonyx and Triceratops, covering size, diet, classification, geologic period, and discovery history.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Property | Baryonyx | Triceratops |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific Name | Baryonyx walkeri | Triceratops horridus |
| Classification | Spinosauridae | Ceratopsia |
| Period | Cretaceous Early | Cretaceous Late |
| Diet | Piscivore | Herbivore |
| Length | 7.5 m | 9.0 m |
| Height | 2.5 m | 3.0 m |
| Weight | 1.7 t | 6.8 t |
| Discovery Year | 1983 | 1889 |
| Discovery Location | Surrey, England | Denver, Colorado, USA |
| Named By | Alan Charig & Angela Milner | Othniel Charles Marsh |
Size Comparison
roughly the length of a large SUV
roughly the length of a large SUV
Weight Comparison
comparable to 1.7 small cars
about the weight of 1.1 elephants
Timeline Comparison
Diet Comparison
Baryonyx
PiscivoreBaryonyx was a fish-eater, specialized in catching aquatic prey.
Triceratops
HerbivoreTriceratops was a plant-eater, feeding on vegetation like ferns, conifers, and cycads.
Classification Comparison
Baryonyx
Triceratops
Did You Know?
Triceratops weighed roughly 4x more than Baryonyx.
Baryonyx was a piscivore while Triceratops was a herbivore.
Baryonyx lived during the Cretaceous Early while Triceratops lived during the Cretaceous Late, separated by roughly 0 million years.
Triceratops was discovered 94 years earlier, in 1889.
Baryonyx belonged to Spinosauridae while Triceratops belonged to Ceratopsia.
Compare With Other Dinosaurs
Explore These Dinosaurs
Explore the Natural World
Discover more across the Nature FYI family